Amanda Coetzer vs Justine Henin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W L W L L
Form
W W W W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Coetzer 2 - 1 Henin
They have played 8 sets in total, with Coetzer winning 4 and Henin winning 4. The last match between Coetzer and Henin was at the adidas International - Sydney, 09-01-2003, Quarterfinals, Hard with Justine Henin getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 |
| Justine Henin | 1 |
adidas International - Sydney(09-01-2003)
6
4
6
4
| Coetzer | Stats | Henin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 12 | Highest Rank | 1 |
| 53 | Age | 42 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 43 |
| 63% (576-340) | Career Total W/L | 82% (471-105) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $10,005,690 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 7-5 4-6 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 41 | Games Won | 34 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amanda Coetzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Dinara Safina
Player
Amanda Coetzer
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Coetzer
Player
Tara Snyder
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Amanda Coetzer
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Coetzer
Player
Barbara Schett
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Justine Henin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Svetlana Kuznetsova
Player
Justine Henin
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justine Henin
Player
Elena Baltacha
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justine Henin
Player
Sania Mirza
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R4 |
Stats
Kim Clijsters
Player
Justine Henin
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Justine Henin
Player
Nadezda Petrova
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justine Henin
Player
Kristina Barrois
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (576/340) | Win/Loss | 82% (471/105) |
| 60% (1248/834) | Sets Win/Loss | 76% (1000/315) |
| 54% (10200/8645) | Games Win/Loss | 60% (7239/4845) |
| 64% (269/152) | Hard Win/Loss | 83% (214/44) |
| 69% (196/89) | Clay Win/Loss | 85% (131/23) |
| 53% (69/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (73/27) |
| 47% (15/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 83% (53/11) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 3 | Aces Total | 688 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 1013 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 286.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.57 |
| 69% (404/583) | 1st Serve % | 54% (8430/15508) |
| 60% (242/404) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (5858/8349) |
| 50% (89/179) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3537/7049) |
| 49% (33/67) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1164/2308) |
| 45% (271/597) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7915/16112) |
| 64% (77/43) | Slam W/L | 83% (141/28) |
| 57% (44/33) | Masters W/L | 80% (113/28) |
| 65% (15/8) | Cups W/L | 88% (15/2) |
| 63% (168/99) | Main Tour W/L | 81% (201/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 76% (51/16) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (27/22) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (569/907) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 82% (468/571) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 57% (57/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (70/113) |
| 60% (157/261) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (104/162) |
| 91% (541/493) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (444/411) |
| 9% (541/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (444/31) |
| 22% (371/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 45% (132/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
